From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cothron v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2005
912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-1164.

September 7, 2005.

Lower Tribunal No. 5D05-495.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to have Cothran v. State, Case No. 5D05-495, reinstated in the Fifth District Court of Appeal, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists.).

WELLS, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cothron v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2005
912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Cothron v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY COTHRON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 7, 2005

Citations

912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)