From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cothran v. Experian, LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jul 21, 2022
2:22-cv-2307-JTF-atc (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-2307-JTF-atc

07-21-2022

MONTRICIA COTHRAN, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, LLC, ET AL, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ANNIE T. CHRISTOFF. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 16, 2022, Plaintiff Montricia Cothran filed a pro se civil complaint, along with a short form application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) On May 19, 2022, this Court entered its Directing Plaintiff to File a Properly Completed In Forma Pauperis Application or Pay the Civil Filing Fee. (ECF No. 6.) Court records indicate that the Order and a blank copy of the correct long-form application were mailed by the Clerk's Office to Plaintiff on May 20, 2022.

Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2013-05, this case has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for management and for all pretrial matters for determination and/or report and recommendation as appropriate.

In the Order, the Court noted that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) permits an indigent plaintiff to avoid payment of filing fees by filing a proper in forma pauperis application. Under § 1915(a), the Court must conduct a satisfactory inquiry into the plaintiff's ability to pay the filing fee and prosecute the lawsuit. A plaintiff seeking in forma pauperis status must respond fully to the questions on the Court's in forma pauperis form and execute the application in compliance with the certification requirements contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1746. See, e.g., Reynolds v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 30 Fed.Appx. 574 (6th Cir. 2002); Broque v. Fort Knox Fed. Credit Union, 114 F.3d 1186 (6th Cir. 1997).

Because Plaintiff submitted the short-form in forma pauperis application for prisoners (ECF No. 2), instead of the long-form application for indigent non-prisoners, the Court had insufficient financial information to determine if Plaintiff is unable to pay the civil filing fee. As a result, Plaintiff was ordered “to either submit a properly completed non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 civil filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.” (ECF No. 6, at 2.) Plaintiff was warned that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order in a timely manner will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.” (Id.)

Twenty-eight U.S.C. § 1914(a) requires a civil filing fee of $350. However, pursuant to § 1914(b), “[t]he clerk shall collect from the parties such additional fees only as are prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States.” The Judicial Conference has prescribed, effective May 1, 2013, an additional administrative fee of $52 for filing any civil case, except for cases seeking habeas corpus and cases in which the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. As a result, the total filing fee for civil cases is $402.

When a plaintiff fails to satisfy the Court's in forma pauperis application procedures or pay the civil filing fee, “[t]he Court has the authority to dismiss an action for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or to obey a Court order under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and under the Court's inherent authority to dismiss the action sua sponte.” James v. Brennan, No. 1:19-cv-853-HSO-jcg, 2020 WL 3803912, at *1 (S.D.Miss. Jul. 7, 2020) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962)); see also Werlins v. DNI, DOD, No. 17-cv-2467-SHM-cgc, 2017 WL 4697073, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2017) (dismissing the case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) when the plaintiff failed to timely submit a proper in forma pauperis application or pay the civil filing fee).

In this case, Plaintiff's deadline to either return the correct long-form application or pay the $402 civil filing fee was June 20, 2022. To date, Plaintiff has failed to do either, and over one month has passed since her deadline expired. It is therefore recommended that the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b).

RECOMMENDATION

For the foregoing reasons, this Court recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the May 19, 2022 Order and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

NOTICE

Within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation disposition, a party may serve and file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver of objections, exceptions, and further appeal.


Summaries of

Cothran v. Experian, LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jul 21, 2022
2:22-cv-2307-JTF-atc (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Cothran v. Experian, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MONTRICIA COTHRAN, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, LLC, ET AL, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Jul 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-2307-JTF-atc (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 21, 2022)