From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COTA v. QUINN

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Mar 19, 2007
No. CV-05-021-CI (E.D. Wash. Mar. 19, 2007)

Opinion

No. CV-05-021-CI.

March 19, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Magistrate Judge Imbrogno filed a Report and Recommendation on January 5, 2007, recommending Petitioner's "Motion for Reinstatement of Time to File Cause Why Said Matter Should Not be Dismissed as Untimely" be dismissed with prejudice. (Ct. Rec. 49.) After requesting and receiving an extension of time to file objections (Ct. Rec. 53), Petitioner filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on February 26, 2007. (Ct. Rec. 54.) Petitioner did not respond to the substance of the Report and Recommendation. Rather, he asked that he be allowed to reopen his habeas claim. There being no legal basis for this request, and no legal basis for changing the Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The "Motion for Reinstatement of Time to File Cause Why Said Matter Should Not be Dismissed as Untimely" (Ct. Rec. 45) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive shall forward copies of this Order to Petitioner and counsel for Respondent. The file shall be closed.


Summaries of

COTA v. QUINN

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Mar 19, 2007
No. CV-05-021-CI (E.D. Wash. Mar. 19, 2007)
Case details for

COTA v. QUINN

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS DONALD COTA, Petitioner, v. KENNETH QUINN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Washington

Date published: Mar 19, 2007

Citations

No. CV-05-021-CI (E.D. Wash. Mar. 19, 2007)