From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coston v. Nangalama

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 15, 2022
2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB

10-15-2022

DANNY MURPHY COSTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Julie A. Shepard (SBN 175538) Alice S. Kim (SBN 317479) Eric Wolff (SBN 341180) JENNER & BLOCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Danny Murphy Coston


Julie A. Shepard (SBN 175538) Alice S. Kim (SBN 317479) Eric Wolff (SBN 341180) JENNER & BLOCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Danny Murphy Coston

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY

[NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; AND DECLARATION OF ERIC WOLFF FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH]

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having considered the parties' briefs and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Discovery is GRANTED.

Discovery is reopened for 120 days commencing from the date this Order is electronically filed. The parties are further ordered to file a Joint Status Report not later than 30 days after the close of discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Coston v. Nangalama

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 15, 2022
2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Coston v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:DANNY MURPHY COSTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 15, 2022

Citations

2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2022)