From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costas v. Marmarellis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
Dec 20, 1951
200 Misc. 912 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)

Opinion

12-20-1951

William Costas et al., Appellants, v. Athena Marmarellis, Respondent.


Harry Katz for appellants. Theodore O. Zoob for respondent. FENNELLY, HOOLEY and WALSH, JJ., concur. Per Curiam. The complaint sets forth a good cause of action to recover gifts, or their value, alleged to have been made conditionally by plaintiffs to defendant in contemplation of her marriage to plaintiffs' son. Such an action is not barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. It was therefore error to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint for legal insufficiency. The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to plaintiffs, and motion to dismiss the complaint denied, with $10 costs. Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Costas v. Marmarellis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
Dec 20, 1951
200 Misc. 912 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)
Case details for

Costas v. Marmarellis

Case Details

Full title:William Costas et al., Appellants,v.Athena Marmarellis, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

Date published: Dec 20, 1951

Citations

200 Misc. 912 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)