From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costanzi v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 6, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-752 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-752

11-06-2015

SHIRLEY A. COSTANZI, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 11) of Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn, recommending the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge and remand the above-captioned matter for further proceedings with respect to the application for disability insurance benefits of plaintiff Shirley A. Costanzi ("Costanzi"), wherein Judge Cohn concludes that the administrative law judge's decision is not "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and finds specifically that the administrative law judge improperly assessed a residual functional capacity with greater capabilities than all submitted medical opinions regarding Costanzi's physical function, (see Doc. 11 at 19-26), erred in relying on Costanzi's noncompliance with her recommended course of medical treatment without considering her explanations for noncompliance, (see id. at 26), and failed to explain adequately her rejection of mental limitation opinions authored by numerous treating examining sources in favor of a state agency source opinion, (see id. at 27), and wherein Judge Cohn recommends that the matter be remanded for full development of the record and a new administrative hearing, and the court noting that the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") has objected to the report, (Doc. 12), and Costanzi has filed a response (Doc. 13) in support of Judge Cohn's recommendations, and following a de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Trans., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court finding Judge Cohn's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and further finding the Commissioner's objection to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 11) of Magistrate Judge Cohn is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Shirley A. Costanzi and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision denying the application for disability insurance benefits of Shirley A. Costanzi is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 11) of Magistrate Judge Cohn.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Costanzi v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 6, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-752 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Costanzi v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY A. COSTANZI, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-752 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Colvin

8 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2013); Kaumans v. Astrue, 3:11-CV-01404, 2012 WL 5864436, at *12 (M.D.Pa. Nov.19, 2012)…

Tilton v. Colvin

e, 3:11–CV–01404, 2012 WL 5864436, at *12 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2012) (Caputo, J.); Troshak v. Astrue,…