From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costantino v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
1:21-cv-07248-MKV (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-07248-MKV

05-11-2022

SARA COSTANTINO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; COMMANDING OFFICER JOHN DOE, first and last name unknown, Shield No. Unknown; POLICE OFFICER JANE ROE, first and last name unknown, Shield No. Unknown; and POLICE OFFICER CARASQUILLO, first name unknown, Shield No. Unknown, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 13]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by June 11, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Costantino v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
1:21-cv-07248-MKV (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Costantino v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SARA COSTANTINO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK; COMMANDING OFFICER JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-07248-MKV (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)