Costa-Hughes v. Mullen Const. Co.

Full title: MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 28, 1993

631 A.2d 1245 (N.J. 1993)

631 A.2d 1245

Opinion

Argued September 14, 1993 —

Decided October 28, 1993.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mark B. Zirulnik argued the cause for appellant ( Isaacson, Dougherty Zirulnik, attorneys; Louis M. Masucci, Jr., on the brief).

Robert A. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent ( Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna, Reitman Greenstein, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 267 N.J. Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).

STEIN, J., dissenting.

I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin's dissenting opinion, reported at 267 N.J. Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).