From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosme-Burgos v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 6, 2012
CASE NO.: SC12-1607 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC12-1607 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D12-1253 Lower Tribunal No.: 06-CF-007829-A-O

12-06-2012

VICTOR M. COSME-BURGOS APetitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORID Respondent(s)


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court
kb
Served:
HON. LAWSON LEDRAN LAMAR
HON. PAMELA R. MASTERS, CLERK
VICTOR M. COSME-BURGOS
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
HON. LYDIA GARDNER, CLERK


Summaries of

Cosme-Burgos v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 6, 2012
CASE NO.: SC12-1607 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Cosme-Burgos v. State

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR M. COSME-BURGOS APetitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORID Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: SC12-1607 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2012)