See, e.g., Atain Specialty Ins. Co. v. Reno Cab Co., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14449 *5-8 (D. Nevada 2019) (vacating summary judgement to facilitate settlement as no considerations of equity weighed against doing so); Quest Integrity USA, LLC v. A.Hak Indus. Servs. US, LLC, No. 2:14-CV-01971-RAJ, 2019 WL 1572691, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2019) (“In this case, the Court finds that the strong public interest in the settlement of this litigation and the conservation of judicial resources outweigh the benefit of the limited collateral estoppel effect of the orders entered to date in this case.”); Cosgrove v. Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., No. 2:14-CV-2229-HRH, 2019 WL 3944551, at *1 (D. Ariz. Aug. 21, 2019) (“On May 4, 2017, the parties formally notified the court that they had reached a settlement. As part of their settlement, the parties requested that the court vacate and seal its orders on the cross-motions for partial summary judgment...”)