From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosgrove v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1977
58 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

July 7, 1977


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 14, 1977 in Columbia County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his application to compel the respondent, Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Canaan, to prepare and file an inventory as required by subdivision 3 of section 142 High. of the Highway Law. Subsequent to the filing of the appeal, respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the inventory requested by the petition had been filed while this litigation was pending and thus the central issue in this litigation has become moot. We denied respondent's motion to dismiss without prejudice to its renewal on oral argument of the appeal. We now grant the motion to dismiss the appeal. Mandamus should not be granted for the purpose of determining a moot question (Matter of Daub v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 33 A.D.2d 964; People ex rel. Van Voast v Townley, 184 App. Div. 568, 569). Petitioner's request for attorney's fees and expenses of litigation is also denied (Miss Susan, Inc. v Enterprise Century Undergarment Co., 270 App. Div. 747, 750, affd 297 N.Y. 512). Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Main, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cosgrove v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1977
58 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Cosgrove v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN COSGROVE, Appellant, v. WILLIAM HANSON, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Northeastern Harness Horsemen's Ass'n. v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

Thus, the central issue presented by this appeal — whether the event as planned is legal — has become…

Matter of Allen Group, Inc. v. Adduci

Initially, we observe that by virtue of respondents' withdrawal of the contested RFP, petitioner's first…