From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosgriff v. Cnty. of Winnebago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16 CV 50037 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16 CV 50037

06-23-2016

Kelly J. Cosgriff, et al. Plaintiffs, v. County of Winnebago, et al. Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees and expenses from defendants Josef Kurlinkus [61] and Kurlinkus Law LLC [63]. In their motion, plaintiffs represent that defendants Kurlinkus and Kurlinkus Law, both present in the United States, failed, without good cause, to execute waivers of service and thus the court is obligated under Rule 4(b)(2) to impose the costs of service. Specifically, plaintiffs seek $554.27 ($204.27 in costs and $350.00 in attorney fees) against Kurlinkus and $690.00 ($340.00 in costs and $350.00 in attorney fees) against Kurlinkus Law. Both defendants have filed a statement indicating that the motions are unopposed. Accordingly, in view of the mandatory language of Rule 4(b)(2) and the lack of opposition from defendants, it is this Court's Report and Recommendation that plaintiffs' motions be granted. Any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by July 11, 2016. Failure to object may constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. See Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260 (7th Cir. 1989). Date: June 23, 2016

/s/_________

Iain D. Johnston, U. S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Cosgriff v. Cnty. of Winnebago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16 CV 50037 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Cosgriff v. Cnty. of Winnebago

Case Details

Full title:Kelly J. Cosgriff, et al. Plaintiffs, v. County of Winnebago, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

No. 16 CV 50037 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 23, 2016)