From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cortwright v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1866.

December 22, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered August 11, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motions by defendants 2112 White Plains Road, LLC, ACHS Management Corp. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion by 2112 White Plains Road and ACHS Management, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants 2112 White Plains Road, LLC and ACHS Management Corp. dismissing the complaint as against them.

Law Office of Lori D. Fishman, Tarrytown (Michael J. Latini of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

McAndrew, Conboy Prisco, LLP, Woodbury (Yasmin D. Soto of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Silberstein, Awad Miklos, P.C., Garden City (Dana E. Heitz of counsel), for Maria Ramos Cortwright and Mohammad Malik, respondents.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Deborah A. Brenner of counsel), for municipal respondent.

White, Quinlan Staley, L.L.P., Garden City (Eileen Farrell of counsel), for Trammell Crow Corporate Services, Inc., respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Defendants 2112 White Plains Road and ACHS Management established prima facie that they neither created a defective condition in the sidewalk nor used the sidewalk for a special purpose ( see Romero v ELJ Realty Corp., 38 AD3d 263). ACHS's senior property manager testified that ACHS had no record of any sidewalk maintenance performed by ACHS in front of the CVS Pharmacy store where plaintiff Cortwright allegedly slipped and fell on the ramp in the curb. In opposition, plaintiffs offered no evidence to support either their allegation that 2112 and ACHS may have undertaken such a repair or their contention that 2112 and ACHS used the public sidewalk for their own special benefit ( see Balsam v Delma Eng'g Corp., 139 AD2d 292, 298-299, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 73 NY2d 783).

However, issues of fact remain whether defendant CVS Pharmacy engaged in repair work that may have created a defective condition that caused the accident, in light of CVS's allegation that third-party defendant Trammell Crow Corporate Services, which has not yet been deposed, negligently repaired the sidewalk where the accident occurred and the record evidence that before the accident CVS had made one call concerning the sidewalk on the "fixed line" it maintained for requesting repairs ( see George v New York City Tr. Auth., 306 AD2d 160).


Summaries of

Cortwright v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 2009
68 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Cortwright v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:MARIA RAMOS CORTWRIGHT et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9518
891 N.Y.S.2d 377

Citing Cases

Higuero v. City of New York

Moreover, plaintiff offers no evidence to support his allegations that Max installed or replaced the sidewalk…