From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cortez v. Baskin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-0073 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 20-0073 (UNA)

01-31-2020

DARLENE CORTEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BASKIN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact."). Having reviewed the plaintiff's complaint, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, the complaint is frivolous and must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: January 31, 2020

/s/_________

AMIT P. MEHTA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cortez v. Baskin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-0073 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Cortez v. Baskin

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE CORTEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BASKIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 20-0073 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)