From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corson-Derksen v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 2, 2015
Case No. 3:12cv00177 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12cv00177

04-02-2015

ROBYN CORSON-DERKSEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Attached hereto is a NOTICE to the parties regarding objections to this Report and Recommendations.

This case is before the Court upon the Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff's attorney (Doc. #12), and the Commissioner's Response (Doc. #13). The Commissioner does not object to an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount of $6,931.25. (Doc. #13, PageID at 117).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:


1. The Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees (Doc. #12) be GRANTED;



2. The Commissioner be directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount of $6,931.25; and
3. The case remain terminated on the docket of this Court.
April 2, 2015

s/Sharon L. Ovington

Sharon L. Ovington

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days because this Report is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof.

Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

Corson-Derksen v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 2, 2015
Case No. 3:12cv00177 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Corson-Derksen v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ROBYN CORSON-DERKSEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:12cv00177 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2015)