From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

U.S.
Mar 7, 1960
362 U.S. 144 (1960)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.

No. 652.

Decided March 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 171 Cal.App.2d 816, 342 P.2d 56.

Appellant pro se.

Henry F. Walker for appellee.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Summaries of

Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

U.S.
Mar 7, 1960
362 U.S. 144 (1960)
Case details for

Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:CORSO v . SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, EXECUTOR

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 7, 1960

Citations

362 U.S. 144 (1960)

Citing Cases

Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.

Consequently, the Court holds that the dead man's statute is constitutional. Accord, Corso v. Security-First…