From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corrales v. Vega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 12-01876 JVS (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2015)

Summary

explaining that "[w]hen a district court grants leave to amend for a specified purpose, it does not thereafter abuse its discretion by dismissing any portions of the amended complaint that were not permitted"

Summary of this case from Benton v. Laborers' Joint Training Fund

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 12-01876 JVS (RZ)

02-11-2015

EDDIE CORRALES, Plaintiff, v. M. VEGA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the file in this matter, and has read and reviewed the Second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations in the Second Report. As recommended therein, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. DATED: February 11, 2015

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Corrales v. Vega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 12-01876 JVS (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2015)

explaining that "[w]hen a district court grants leave to amend for a specified purpose, it does not thereafter abuse its discretion by dismissing any portions of the amended complaint that were not permitted"

Summary of this case from Benton v. Laborers' Joint Training Fund
Case details for

Corrales v. Vega

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE CORRALES, Plaintiff, v. M. VEGA, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 12-01876 JVS (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Ferrante

(emphasis in original); Corrales v. Vega, No. ED CV 12-01876 JVS R, 2015 WL 575961, at *3 (C.D. Cal.…

Benton v. Laborers' Joint Training Fund

Because those modifications exceed the scope of the Court's invitation to seek amendment, and significantly…