From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corral v. Low

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-00731-WDK-SP (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00731-WDK-SP

12-20-2024

JOSE TERRAZAS CORRAL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN FCC LOMPOC LOW II, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

WILLIAM D. KELLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Docket No. 1), the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6), records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report,” Docket No. 9). Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6) is granted, and Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Corral v. Low

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-00731-WDK-SP (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Corral v. Low

Case Details

Full title:JOSE TERRAZAS CORRAL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN FCC LOMPOC LOW II, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00731-WDK-SP (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)