From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corral v. Energizer Holdings Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
1:12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)

Opinion

          ELAINE A. RYAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), PATRICIA N. SYVERSON (203111), LINDSEY M. GOMEZ-GRAY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, Attorneys for Plaintiff Aida Corral.

          DANIEL SCOTT SCHECTER (Bar No. 171472), MICHAEL J. REISS (Bar No. 275021), LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

          SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff Aida Corral and Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel of record, jointly move as follows:

         WHEREAS, on August 1, 2013, Judge Ishii granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and ordered that Plaintiff file an amended complaint, if any, on or before September 3, 2013 (30 days following the Court's Order) [D.E. 54];

         WHEREAS, on August 20, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Judge Ishii's August 1, 2013 Orders [D.E. 55];

         WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and believe that it would be in the parties' and the Court's best interests to continue the filing of Plaintiff's amended complaint, if any, until after the Court rules on Defendants' pending Motion for Reconsideration;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties jointly request as follows:

         1. That Plaintiff has 30 days following the Court's ruling regarding Defendants' pending Motion for Reconsideration to file an amended complaint.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to the above stipulation, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the Court's ruling on Defendants' pending Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 55).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Corral v. Energizer Holdings Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 9, 2013
1:12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Corral v. Energizer Holdings Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AIDA CORRAL, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

Citations

1:12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2013)