From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corporate Visions v. Sterling Promotional

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2005
21 A.D.3d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-08733.

September 19, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered September 16, 2004, which denied its motion to "restore" the action to active status.

Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin Lever Goodman, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Thomas B. Decea and Donald S. Campbell of counsel), for appellant.

Rogovin Golub Bernstein Wexler, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Benjamin J. Golub of counsel), for respondent Sterling Promotional Corp.

Before: Adams, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion is granted.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff's motion to "restore" this pre-note of issue case to active status ( see Long-Waithe v. Kings Apparel Inc., 10 AD3d 413; see also Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190; Kallicharan v. Coombes Props., Inc., 7 AD3d 578; cf. 123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 AD3d 769, 769-770).


Summaries of

Corporate Visions v. Sterling Promotional

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2005
21 A.D.3d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Corporate Visions v. Sterling Promotional

Case Details

Full title:CORPORATE VISIONS, INC., Appellant, v. STERLING PROMOTIONAL CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6767
800 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

Sterling Promotional Corp. v. General Acc. Ins. Co. of New York

Corporate Visions, Inc. v. Sterling Promotional Corp., 2000 WL 33217350, No. 00-cv-4663 FB (E.D.N.Y. August…

Reed v. Cornell Univ.

In light of the foregoing, the action should have been restored and the note of issue should not have been…