From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corporate Express Office Products, Inc. v. Guelpen

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
May 7, 2003
CASE NO. C 02-04588 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 02-04588 WHA

May 7, 2003

PETER D. HOLBROOK (Bar No. 105845) CHRIS C. SCHEITHAUER (Bar No. 184798) McDERMOTT, WILL EMERY Irvine, CA Attorneys for Plaintiff CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.

Dov M. Grunschlag, Esq. Eugene M. Pak, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants STEVE VAN GUELPEN, TOM ENNS, HARRY TORRES, MARY KAROL, KRISTY MONESKI, HALENDA CROCKER, JANIE GAZAY, and LEROY DIAS


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL


This Stipulation is entered into with respect to the following facts:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action, including all claims and counterclaims, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), except that the Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release between the parties, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Settlement Agreement").

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. This above-referenced matter, including all claims and counterclaims, is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), except that the Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement.


Summaries of

Corporate Express Office Products, Inc. v. Guelpen

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
May 7, 2003
CASE NO. C 02-04588 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2003)
Case details for

Corporate Express Office Products, Inc. v. Guelpen

Case Details

Full title:CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware corporation Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: May 7, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C 02-04588 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2003)