Opinion
Argued June 15, 1999
October 4, 1999
Appeal much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.).
ORDERED that the order entered February 6, 1998, is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated June 5, 1997, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
It is well settled that "applications for adjournments for any purpose are ordinarily addressed to the trial court's sound discretion" ( Cuevas v. Cuevas, 110 A.D.2d 873, 877; see, People v. Spears, 64 N.Y.2d 698, 699-700; Treppeda v. Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it denied the motion for an adjournment.
Contrary to the temporary receiver's contention, the court properly determined that he is entitled to the 5 % maximum statutory commission ( see, Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek 202 A.D.2d 20).
The appellants-respondents' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
RITTER, J.P., THOMPSON, FEUERSTEIN, and SMITH. JJ., concur.