From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coronado v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Aug 12, 2020
ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-243-Y (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2020)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-243-Y

08-12-2020

ELENA SARA CORONADO v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

On July 6, 2020, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above-styled and numbered cause. An order issued that same day gave all parties fourteen days thereafter to serve and file with the Court written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none.

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 12, 2020.

/s/_________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Coronado v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Aug 12, 2020
ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-243-Y (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Coronado v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ELENA SARA CORONADO v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2020

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-243-Y (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2020)