From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coronado v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P

11-09-2022

ISSAC M. CORONADO, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 17, 2022, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's September 21, 2022 order denying plaintiff's motion for leave to amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 70) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Coronado v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Coronado v. Saukhla

Case Details

Full title:ISSAC M. CORONADO, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)