From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coronado v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P

07-15-2021

ISSAC M. CORONADO, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 30 2.

On June 16, 2021 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 16, 2021 are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment claim is dismissed.


Summaries of

Coronado v. Saukhla

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Coronado v. Saukhla

Case Details

Full title:ISSAC M. CORONADO, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)