Opinion
15106, 300748/11
05-14-2015
Carlos CORONADO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 3479 ASSOCIATES LLC, Defendant–Respondent, Raul A. Jovel, Defendant.
Peña & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Diane W. Bando of counsel), for appellant. Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP (Lindsay R. Kaplow of counsel), for respondent.
Peña & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Diane W. Bando of counsel), for appellant.
Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP (Lindsay R. Kaplow of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., SAXE, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered November 29, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendant 3479 Associates LLC for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims for negligent retention and supervision, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly dismissed plaintiff's claims that defendant was negligent in retaining and supervising defendant Raul A. Jovel, the superintendent of defendant's apartment building, who allegedly assaulted plaintiff tenant. Plaintiff's prior complaints that Jovel had used hostile language in aggressively rebuffing plaintiff's request to fix the heating did not establish that defendant knew or should have known of Jovel's “propensity for the sort of conduct which caused the injury” (Sheila C. v. Povich, 11 A.D.3d 120, 130, 781 N.Y.S.2d 342 [1st Dept 2004] ; see Nouel v. 325 Wadsworth Realty LLC, 112 A.D.3d 493, 977 N.Y.S.2d 217 [1st Dept 2013], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 904, 2014 WL 2521716 [2014] ). Plaintiff's reliance on his testimony that Jovel had previously brandished a large, metal keychain in a threatening manner, and that Jovel struck plaintiff's nose with the keychain during the subject incident, is unavailing in the absence of any evidence that defendant knew or should have known of Jovel's alleged prior conduct.