From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corona v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB

10-06-2011

MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORONA, AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR CRUZ, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588) MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026) Three Embarcadero Center Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario Corona and Andres Santana


BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588)

MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026)

Three Embarcadero Center

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario

Corona and Andres Santana

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 16(b)(4), the parties stipulate to an extension of the deadlines in the Scheduling Order issued on June 30, 2011 (Docket Item # 97).

Defendants require additional time to complete their document production. Declaration Of Manu Pradhan In Support Of Stipulation Regarding Scheduling Order ("Pradhan Decl."), ¶¶ 3-4. Progress has also been delayed because the parties are negotiating a Protective Order to facilitate the production of documents Defendants will not otherwise produce based on their claims of confidentiality. Pradhan Decl., ¶¶ 5. Other discovery issues have arisen that are delaying the case, and though the parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding those issues, some motion practice is likely. Pradhan Decl., ¶ 4.

The parties have discussed how these issues affect the case schedule. Pradhan Decl., ¶¶ 6-7. Subject to the availability of the Court, the parties jointly request that the Court amend the Scheduling Order to reflect the following dates:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Date ¦New Dates Ordered By Court ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Stipulation or ¦October 7, ¦ ¦ ¦Motions ¦2011 November ¦January 5, 2012 ¦ ¦Amending ¦30, 2011, ¦ ¦ ¦Pleadings ¦ ¦Parties to contact Magistrate Judge for acceptable date. ¦ ¦ ¦10:00 a.m., ¦ ¦ ¦Settlement ¦Courtroom 9 ¦ ¦ ¦Conference ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Non- Expert ¦December 2, ¦March 1, 2012 ¦ ¦Discovery ¦2011 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Expert ¦February 3, ¦May 3, 2012 ¦ ¦Discovery ¦2012 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦February 15, ¦ ¦ ¦Non-Dispositive¦2012 ¦May 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion: ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Hearing re ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Non-Dispositive¦March 9, 2012 ¦June 7, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Dispositive ¦April 20, 2012¦June 29, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion: ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Hearing re ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Dispositive ¦June 5, 2012 ¦August 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Date ¦New Dates Ordered By Court ¦ +-----------------+------------------------------+----------------------------¦ ¦Pre-Trial ¦July 17, 2012, 8:30 a.m., ¦October 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Conference ¦Courtroom 4 ¦at 8:30 a.m. ¦ +-----------------+------------------------------+----------------------------¦ ¦ ¦September 10, 2012, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦December 10, 2012 at 8:30 ¦ ¦Trial ¦8:30 a.m., Courtroom 4 JT 5 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ ¦ ¦days ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

Manu Pradhan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Kelli M. Hammond

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE showing, the dates are modified as reflected above and with dates in bold different than those requested by the parties' stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Corona v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Corona v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORONA, AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR CRUZ, et. al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)