Opinion
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB
10-06-2011
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588) MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026) Three Embarcadero Center Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario Corona and Andres Santana
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588)
MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026)
Three Embarcadero Center
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario
Corona and Andres Santana
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 16(b)(4), the parties stipulate to an extension of the deadlines in the Scheduling Order issued on June 30, 2011 (Docket Item # 97).
Defendants require additional time to complete their document production. Declaration Of Manu Pradhan In Support Of Stipulation Regarding Scheduling Order ("Pradhan Decl."), ¶¶ 3-4. Progress has also been delayed because the parties are negotiating a Protective Order to facilitate the production of documents Defendants will not otherwise produce based on their claims of confidentiality. Pradhan Decl., ¶¶ 5. Other discovery issues have arisen that are delaying the case, and though the parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding those issues, some motion practice is likely. Pradhan Decl., ¶ 4.
The parties have discussed how these issues affect the case schedule. Pradhan Decl., ¶¶ 6-7. Subject to the availability of the Court, the parties jointly request that the Court amend the Scheduling Order to reflect the following dates:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Date ¦New Dates Ordered By Court ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Stipulation or ¦October 7, ¦ ¦ ¦Motions ¦2011 November ¦January 5, 2012 ¦ ¦Amending ¦30, 2011, ¦ ¦ ¦Pleadings ¦ ¦Parties to contact Magistrate Judge for acceptable date. ¦ ¦ ¦10:00 a.m., ¦ ¦ ¦Settlement ¦Courtroom 9 ¦ ¦ ¦Conference ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Non- Expert ¦December 2, ¦March 1, 2012 ¦ ¦Discovery ¦2011 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Expert ¦February 3, ¦May 3, 2012 ¦ ¦Discovery ¦2012 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦February 15, ¦ ¦ ¦Non-Dispositive¦2012 ¦May 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion: ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Hearing re ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Non-Dispositive¦March 9, 2012 ¦June 7, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Filing of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Dispositive ¦April 20, 2012¦June 29, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion: ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Hearing re ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Dispositive ¦June 5, 2012 ¦August 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Motion ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Date ¦New Dates Ordered By Court ¦ +-----------------+------------------------------+----------------------------¦ ¦Pre-Trial ¦July 17, 2012, 8:30 a.m., ¦October 15, 2012 ¦ ¦Conference ¦Courtroom 4 ¦at 8:30 a.m. ¦ +-----------------+------------------------------+----------------------------¦ ¦ ¦September 10, 2012, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦December 10, 2012 at 8:30 ¦ ¦Trial ¦8:30 a.m., Courtroom 4 JT 5 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ ¦ ¦days ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Manu Pradhan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Kelli M. Hammond
Attorney for Defendants
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE showing, the dates are modified as reflected above and with dates in bold different than those requested by the parties' stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE