Cornwall v. Baird

1 Citing case

  1. In re Gold King Mines, Inc.

    Case No. 3-84-00175-HAR In Chapter 11, ADV PROC NO 3-84-00175-001-HAR (Bankr. D. Alaska Jul. 22, 1996)

    See, 30 U.S.C. 28, AS 38.05.220, and Sisters' Memorandum on Advertising Out, dated November 17, 1995, attaching an excerpt from the American Law of Mining, 2nd ed, 30.05[10] and 46.04[1]. See, also, Cornwall v Baird, 730 P.2d 156 (Alaska 1986) and McIntyre v Parkin, 8 Alaska 41, 43, 47 (1928). The Sisters argue that this is the only way a co-owner of the Mining Claims (whether it be Eric or Paul, Gold King Mines, or the trustee) can acquire the interest of the Sisters in a nonconsensual manner.