From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornish v. Kappos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 13, 2012
474 F. App'x 779 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1157

08-13-2012

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, HARRY I. MOTZ, Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Staff Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, Defendant-Appellees.

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, of Washington, DC, pro se. ELIZABETH ULLMER MENDEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, RONALD K. JAICKS and SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR., Associate Solicitors.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 07-CV-1719, Judge Richard W. Roberts.

JUDGMENT

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, of Washington, DC, pro se.

ELIZABETH ULLMER MENDEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, RONALD K. JAICKS and SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR., Associate Solicitors. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST and REYNA, Ciruit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

___________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Cornish v. Kappos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 13, 2012
474 F. App'x 779 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Cornish v. Kappos

Case Details

Full title:CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, Under…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 779 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Cornish v. United States

The relevant facts are described in earlier opinions. See Cornish v. United States (Cornish III), 885…