Opinion
October, 1918.
Judgment and order reversed, as against the weight of evidence, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Kelly, J., dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Corning v. New York Railways Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1918
185 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Summaries of
Corning v. New York Railways Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1918
185 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for
Corning v. New York Railways Company
Case Details
Full title:ANGELINE CORNING, Respondent, v. NEW YORK RAILWAYS COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1918
Citations
185 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)