From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 17, 1987
835 F.2d 451 (2d Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 298, Docket 87-7535.

Argued November 30, 1987.

Decided December 17, 1987.

William L. Dorr, Rochester, N.Y. (Harris, Beach, Wilcox, Rubin and Levey, Rochester, N.Y., James B. Curtin, Vice President and General Counsel, Southern New England Telephone Co., New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

David M. Lascell and William D. Eggers, Rochester, N.Y. (Nixon, Hargrave, Devans Doyle, Alfred Michaelson, General Patent Counsel, Corning Glass Works, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.

Before PIERCE, MINER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Honorable Oscar H. Davis, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Michael Telesca, Judge, entered pursuant to a decision and order which 1) granted the plaintiff's request for a declaratory judgment that, pursuant to a 1975 Patent License Agreement between Western Electric Company, Inc. and Corning Glass Works, the Southern New England Telephone Company ("SNET") does not possess a sublicense for patents held by Corning Glass Works relating to optical communications systems, optical fiber devices, optical fiber interconnecting apparatus, and optical modulators; 2) rejected SNET's affirmative defenses of estoppel and acquiescence; and 3) denied SNET's counterclaims for interference with business relationships and unfair competition. The order is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Telesca in his thorough opinion, reported at 674 F.Supp. 999 (W.D.N.Y. 1987).


Summaries of

Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 17, 1987
835 F.2d 451 (2d Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:CORNING GLASS WORKS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 1987

Citations

835 F.2d 451 (2d Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Sumitomo Bank of N.Y. Trust v. N. Hempstead

However, Babylon established that it had no power under the contracts at issue here to approve or reject any…

Rodgard Corp. v. Miner Enterprises, Inc.

Estoppel is an equitable remedy which requires that the party invoking such must do so with clean hands; the…