Opinion
10-22-00124-CR 10-22-00125-CR10-22-00126-CR 10-22-00127-CR 10-22-00128-CR10-22-00129-CR 10-22-00130-CR 10-22-00131-CR10-22-00132-CR 10-22-00133-CR 10-22-00134-CR10-22-00135-CR 10-22-00136-CR
05-11-2022
DAVID CORNETT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Do not publish
From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 37235CR, 37236CR, 37237CR, 37238CR, 37239CR, 37240CR, 37241CR, 37242CR, 37243CR, 37244CR, 37245CR, 37246CR, and 37247CR
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice
David Cornett appeals the trial court's denial of Cornett's "Motion for Nunc Pro Tunc Order to Remove the Improper Cumulation Order and Illegal Sentence in Cause No. 37235-37247CR."
We do not have appellate jurisdiction of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex App -Waco 2002, pet dism'd) The appropriate remedy to obtain review of the denial of a nunc pro tunc motion is by a petition for writ of mandamus Ex parte Forooghi, 185 S.W.3d 498 (Tex Crim App 2006) (Johnson, J, concurring statement); see also Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 149 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 43.2(f).
Appeals dismissed