From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corneroli v. Borghi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4460

October 28, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered September 4, 2003, which, after a framed issue hearing, granted the motion of defendants Warren J. Adelson, Adelson Galleries, Inc. and John Doe to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.


In light of the contract by which plaintiff and defendant Borghi became partners in the sale of a valuable painting, plaintiff had no basis on which to assert any claims against the painting's subsequent purchasers, defendants Warren J. Adelson, Adelson Galleries, Inc. and John Doe.

The court's refusal to allow into evidence recordings of conversations between plaintiff and/or his counsel and Borghi, some of which were made, with that counsel's assistance, after the litigation had commenced but before Borghi was represented, if erroneous ( see McHugh v. Fitzgerald, 280 AD2d 771), was harmless ( see O'Brien v. Golan, 284 AD2d 256), since the excluded evidence could not have been productive of a different outcome.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Corneroli v. Borghi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2004
11 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Corneroli v. Borghi

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS CORNEROLI, Appellant, v. MARK BORGHI, Doing Business as BORGHI ART…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

D'Amico v. Corneroli

Judge Gammerman's decision was affirmed in a brief opinion by the Appellate Division. See Corneroli v.…

Nineteen Eighty-Nine, LLC v. Icahn

The exclusion of certain testimony during plaintiff's direct examination of Q Investments' principal,…