From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornelius v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 1984
457 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-2512.

October 12, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, Paul E. Logan, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and William H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James H. Dysart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Affirmed. Under the facts of this case, participation by defendant with her husband in a similar prior criminal act was sufficient to justify admitting evidence of that prior act under the "Williams Rule," section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), especially where there was evidence that defendant and her husband both participated in the crime for which defendant was charged. It matters not that defendant was the principal actor in the crime with which she was charged and not the principal actor in the prior criminal act.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cornelius v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 1984
457 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Cornelius v. State

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE CORNELIUS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 12, 1984

Citations

457 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Escobar

See Remeta v. State, 522 So.2d 825 (Fla.) (testimony regarding robberies and murders committed by defendant…

Escobar v. State

See Remeta v. State, 522 So.2d 825 (Fla.) (testimony regarding robberies and murders committed by defendant…