From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornelius v. Pruet

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 10, 1920
85 So. 430 (Ala. 1920)

Opinion

7 Div. 83.

April 10, 1920.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; E. J. Garrison, Judge.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Arthur L. Hardegree, of Ashland, for appellant.

The clear intent of the constitutional amendment was to exempt soldiers and sailors, and no others; but this did not apply to persons prior to their entry into the service.

John J. Pruet, of Ashland, for appellee.

No brief reached the reporter.


The sole question involved in this appeal is whether or not the petitioner, who had served in the United States Navy for over four months between January 1, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who had been honorably discharged, was entitled to be placed upon the list of the voters of his county without having first paid all poll tax due by him before enlistment. The state's contention is that the constitutional amendment, section 194 1/2, appearing in section 1 of the Acts of 1919, p. 724, exempts him only from the poll tax accruing against him after his enlistment, while the petitioner contends that the constitutional amendment exempts him from liability from all back unpaid tax now due, or for which he would have been otherwise liable, up to September 30, 1923.

Section 1 of said amendment reads as follows:

"That the following amendment to the Constitution of Alabama is hereby proposed to be submitted to the qualified voters of Alabama for their consideration as hereinafter provided, viz.:

"Sec. 194 1/2. (A) The payment of the poll tax mentioned in the Constitution of Alabama shall not be required of any person who served in the military or naval service of the United States for a period of not less than four months between January 1, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who has been or who may be honorably discharged from said service and who was a qualified elector, except as to payment of poll taxes, at the time he entered said service, or who has since become such qualified elector, except as to payment of poll taxes. Any such person is exempted from the payment of all poll taxes until September 30, 1923. (B) Certificates of exemption from payment of such poll taxes shall be issued to persons entitled thereto under regulations prescribed by the Governor."

This court is of the opinion that the petitioner's contention is correct, and that the said amendment clearly and without doubt or ambiguity exempts soldiers and sailors therein embraced from the payment of all poll tax that might have been due by them before as well as after enlistment, or which may have arisen before September 30, 1923, but for the said amendment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cornelius v. Pruet

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 10, 1920
85 So. 430 (Ala. 1920)
Case details for

Cornelius v. Pruet

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS, Probate Judge, v. PRUET

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 10, 1920

Citations

85 So. 430 (Ala. 1920)
85 So. 430

Citing Cases

Hooper v. State

The same word, used more than once in the same section, is used each time with the same meaning. 89 Ala. 461,…

Johnson v. Craft

By this amendment thousands who served in the army and navy during the period of the World War, and who were…