From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corneal v McCurdy

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 13, 2022
No. 21-2063 (4th Cir. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

21-2063

10-13-2022

MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D.; KURT SCHMOKE; MICHELLE WILLIAMS; MARIA RODRIGUEZ, Defendants - Appellees.

Maureen Kateri Corneal, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Joyce Bradley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 25, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-03393-RDB)

Maureen Kateri Corneal, Appellant Pro Se.

Kathryn Joyce Bradley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Maureen Kateri Corneal appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment against her on her claim of age discrimination related to the termination of her employment. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Corneal v. McCurdy, No. 1:19-cv-03393-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Corneal v McCurdy

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 13, 2022
No. 21-2063 (4th Cir. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Corneal v McCurdy

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

No. 21-2063 (4th Cir. Oct. 13, 2022)