From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. BSO Entm't

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 9, 2024
CV 24-06793-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-06793-SPG-E

12-09-2024

Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. BSO Entertainment, LLC.


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Linkv. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before December 17, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendant BSO ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. BSO Entm't

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 9, 2024
CV 24-06793-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. BSO Entm't

Case Details

Full title:Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. BSO Entertainment, LLC.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2024

Citations

CV 24-06793-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024)