From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cores v. Carleton

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Oct 27, 2005
No. CA 05-313ML (D.R.I. Oct. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. CA 05-313ML.

October 27, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Almond on October 13, 2005. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and plaintiff's Objection. The Objection does not address the legal bases for Magistrate Judge Almond's recommendation that plaintiff's suit be dismissed. Rather, plaintiff expresses his frustration with the rules CODAC follows in administering its methadone program. The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Almond's legal analysis of the viability of plaintiff's claims is sound and well-founded in relevant precedent. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The complaint is dismissed.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Cores v. Carleton

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Oct 27, 2005
No. CA 05-313ML (D.R.I. Oct. 27, 2005)
Case details for

Cores v. Carleton

Case Details

Full title:JAIME J. CORES v. JAMES CARLETON, in his capacity as Director of Opioid…

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

No. CA 05-313ML (D.R.I. Oct. 27, 2005)