From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corecivic Inc. v. Candide Grp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
C 20-03792 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

C 20-03792 WHA

09-09-2021

CORECIVIC INC, Plaintiff, v. CANDIDE GROUP LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

WILLIAM ALSUP, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Corecivic moves to stay the determination of attorney's fees by a special master until the resolution of a pending appeal as to the prior order granting defendants' special motion to strike. Defendants Simon and Candide do not oppose the stay.

It is in the interest of judicial efficiency to stay the case until after our court of appeals rules on the appeal. Neither party will be prejudiced by the stay. Though the stay will delay the resolution of attorney's fees, the delay will not be undue because the resolution of the appeal could moot the issue of attorney's fees. Preservation of judicial resources benefits the public and weighs in favor of a stay. The motion to stay is Granted.

The hearing on this motion set for September 23 is hereby Vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Corecivic Inc. v. Candide Grp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
C 20-03792 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Corecivic Inc. v. Candide Grp.

Case Details

Full title:CORECIVIC INC, Plaintiff, v. CANDIDE GROUP LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

C 20-03792 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)