From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cordoba v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P

10-05-2011

WILLIAM CORDOBA, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a request for entry of default against defendant Rivers pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). On September 1, 2011, defendant Rivers filed an answer to plaintiff's amended complaint. The defendant's answer was filed well within sixty days of July 19, 2011, as required by the waiver of service of summons.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for entry of default (Doc. No. 20) is denied.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cordoba v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Cordoba v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CORDOBA, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)