Cordoba v. Dickinson

Full title: WILLIAM CORDOBA, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P.

September 28, 2011

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

Defendants Viera and Rivers have filed a motion for leave to take plaintiff's deposition via video-conference. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the court will grant defendants' motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via video-conference (Doc. No. 27) is granted; and

2. Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any state penal institution to obtain video-conferencing equipment if it is not already available.