From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cordero v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1899 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1899 DAD P.

July 22, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2), is granted;

2. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order.See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

3. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

4. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter; and

5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), and the court's form regarding consent or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

Cordero v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1899 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Cordero v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CORDERO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. McDONALD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1899 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)