Opinion
Page 544d
133 Cal.App.4th 544d __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ SHAOPING CORDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LISA R. CORDER, Defendant and Respondent. LISA R. CORDER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SHAOPING CORDER, Defendant and Appellant. G033608 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Third Division October 25, 2005Super. Ct. Nos. 01CC10590, 01CC00182.
OPINION
SILLS, P. J.
The dissenting opinion filed in this case on September 26, 2005 (132 Cal.App.4th 1261; 34 Cal.Rptr.3d 294) should be modified in the following respects.
(1) Pursuant to section 68902 of the Government Code and page iv of the California Style Manual, the second sentence of footnote 10 on page 33 of the slip opinion should be deleted, and citations of cases subsequent to the first citation of such case which give the year of the decision should be converted to the “supra, [volume and reporter] at [first page or point page, as the case may be]” format.
Reporter's Note: With the court's concurrence, the changes directed by this paragraph were previously made as clerical corrections to the opinion as reported at 132 Cal.App.4tti 1261. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 976(e).)
(2) In footnote 24 of the dissent on page 55 of the slip opinion [132 Cal.App.4th 1306, advance report, fn. 20], the following citation should appear after the first and only sentence making up that footnote: “(See Estate of Armstrong (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 1, 10 [50 Cal.Rptr. 339] [“Oral declarations of a party whose lips are sealed by death is evidence of the weakest kind and should be received with caution. [Citation.] It is particularly unconvincing when the declaration is presented through a witness with a substantial pecuniary interest in the probative effect of the decedent’s declaration.”].)