Cordell v. Superintendent Wakefield

Full title: ERIC ALLEN CORDELL, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT WAKEFIELD, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 23, 2005

Civil Action No. 05-1205 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 23, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1205.

November 23, 2005

ORDER

JOY CONTI, District Judge

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November 2005, after a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed by the petitioner, Eric Allen Cordell, and after the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was issued, and the parties were granted ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the petitioner, and after independent review of the petition and the record, and upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which is adopted and incorporated as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Eric Allen Cordell for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability is denied for lack of a viable constitutional issue.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.