Cordeiro v. Alves

Full title: Marcelo Cordeiro, Appellant, v. Marcelo Castro Alves, et al., Appellees.

Court: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

299 So. 3d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D18-2554

02-19-2020

Marcelo CORDEIRO, Appellant, v. Marcelo Castro ALVES, et al., Appellees.

Meland Russin & Budwick, P.A., and Eric Ostroff, for appellant. SMGQ Law, and Deborah Baker and Rachel E. Walker, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Meland Russin & Budwick, P.A., and Eric Ostroff, for appellant.

SMGQ Law, and Deborah Baker and Rachel E. Walker, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Umana v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 282 So. 3d 933, 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding "we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of the insureds' motion for rehearing premised upon new evidence."); Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Pres., Inc., 381 So. 2d 1164, 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) ("it is not an abuse of discretion for a trial judge to hold that an affidavit filed with a petition for rehearing is too late"), opinion approved of, 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982) ; see also § 44.104(11), Fla. Stat. ("Factual findings determined in the voluntary trial are not subject to appeal.").