Opinion
No. 20-1056
06-18-2020
David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Kathryn Hicks Shields, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly Marie Marston, BROOKS PIERCE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Robert Alford Hasty, Jr., Assistant County Attorney, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; James Scott Flowers, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00645-CCE-LPA) Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Kathryn Hicks Shields, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly Marie Marston, BROOKS PIERCE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Robert Alford Hasty, Jr., Assistant County Attorney, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; James Scott Flowers, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David R. Corbin seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on October 8, 2019. Corbin filed the notice of appeal on January 9, 2020. Because Corbin failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We further deny Corbin leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED