In Corbett v. Laurens, 5 Rich. Eq. 301, a claim for compensation for valuable buildings erected by a life tenant was denied.
Summary of this case from Cagle et al. v. Schaefer et alOctober, 1912.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
In Corbett v. Laurens, 5 Rich. Eq. 301, a claim for compensation for valuable buildings erected by a life tenant was denied.
Summary of this case from Cagle et al. v. Schaefer et alFull title:Louise K. Corbett, Respondent, v. Laurens P. Dixon, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1912
"Upon well settled principles of construction, however, it would seem to be clear that, by the term `issue'…
Cagle et al. v. Schaefer et alThe law is well settled that, as a general rule, the life tenant is not entitled to charge the estate or the…