Opinion
No. 12-04-00009-CV.
Opinion Delivered January 30, 2004.
Appeal from the Judicial District Court of Upshur County, Texas, Trial Court No. 837-03.
Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and DeVASTO, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Wenona Parrish Corbett ("Corbett") filed a notice of appeal on January 14, 2004. The notice of appeal does not state the date of the judgment or order appealed from as required by rule 25.1(d)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Corbett also filed a copy of a motion for new trial filed in the District Court of Upshur County on January 12, 2004. Attached to the motion for new trial is a copy of a default judgment against Corbett signed on February 21, 2003 in the Circuit Court of Pike County, Arkansas. By her motion for new trial, Corbett seeks to prevent the enforcement of the Arkansas judgment.
On January 15, 2004, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1, this court notified Corbett that the information received in this appeal does not include an appealable order and therefore does not show the jurisdiction of this court. Corbett was further notified that unless she amended the information in this appeal on or before January 26, 2004, the appeal would be dismissed. On January 20, 2004, Corbett responded to our notice by informing the court that the appeal is "from the filing of a Foreign Judgment" and submitting a copy of a Notice of Filing Foreign Judgment prepared by the District Clerk of Upshur County, Texas and addressed to Corbett.
This court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to appeals from final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature has deemed appealable. City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849 S.W.2d 810, 811 (Tex. 1993); see, e.g., Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2003). The mere filing of a foreign judgment is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court that this Court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION; that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the appellant, WENONA PARRISH CORBETT, and for which execution shall issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 30th day of January, 2004, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court that this Court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION; that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the appellant, Wenona Parrish Corbett, and for which execution shall issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
WHEREAS, YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to observe the foregoing order of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the ____ day of ____, 200_.