From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corbello v. DeVito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 14, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:O8-cv-00867-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:O8-cv-00867-RCJ-PAL

10-14-2011

DONNA CORBELLO, an individual Plaintiff, v. THOMAS GAETANO DEVITO, individual, et al. Defendants.

DANIEL M. MAYEDA LEOPOLD PETRICH & SMITH, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants FRANKIE VALLI, ROBERT J. GAUDIO, MARSHALL BRICKMAN, ERIC S. ELICE, DES McANUFF, DSHT, INC., DODGER THEATRICALS, LTD., JB VIVA VEGAS L.P. AND GETTING HOME, INC.


SAMUEL S. LIONEL [Nevada Bar #1766]

MAXIMILIANO D. COUVILLIER III [Nevada Bar #7661]

LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS

DANIEL M. MAYEDA (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ABIGAIL A. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

LEOPOLD, PETRICH & SMITH, P.C.

DAVID S. KORZENIK (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

MILLER KORZENIK SOMMERS LLP

488 Madison Avenue

Suite 1120

Attorneys for Defendants

FRANKIE VALLI, ROBERT J. GAUDIO, MARSHALL

BRICKMAN, ERIC S. ELICE, DES McANUFF, DSHT, INC.,

DODGER THEATRICALS, LTD., JB VIVA VEGAS L.P.

AND GETTING HOME, INC.

ORDEO TO SEAL CERTAIN EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF

MICHAEL S. DAVID IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNTS 15-17 OF THE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT (NONEXCLUSIVE LICENSE)

Courtroom:

The Honorable

Robert C. Jones

POINTS & AUTHORITIES

INTRODUCTION

Moving Defendants attached the following exhibits in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts 15-17 (Non-Exclusive License ("MSJ"):

Exhibit 1: Declaration of Michael David ("David Declaration"). Mr. David attached the following two documents to his declaration, which he identified as "Exhibits A, B and C," respectively:

A: May 2004 Production Agreement
B: Photocopy compilation of photos of Thomas DeVito and others at the Broadway, National Tour and Las Vegas openings of Jersey Boys
C: Copy of a sampling of checks that Dodger Theatricals has paid to Thomas DeVito as royalties from Jersey Boys
Exhibit 2: Declaration of Elliot Brown ("Brown Declaration").
Exhibit 3: Declaration of Eric S. Elice ("Elice Declaration").
Exhibit 4: Declaration of Marshall Brickrnan ("Brickman Declaration").

Of the foregoing, Moving Defendants request leave to file under seal only the following two documents:

1) Exhibit A to the David Declaration.
2) Exhibit C to the David Declaration.

II. ARGUMENT

A. Governing Law

The Ninth Circuit recognizes that courts have the power to allow for certain documents and information to be filed under seal in connection with dispositive motions. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (91h Cir. 2006). In which case, Kamakana requires a showing of "compelling reasons" sufficient to outweigh the public's interest in disclosures to justify sealing records. Id. at 1179. "In general, 'compelling reasons' sufficient to outweigh the public's interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such 'court files might have become a vehicle for improper purposes,' such as the use of records to gratify private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets." Id. at 1179.

Other compelling reasons justifying sealing records exist where a party seeks to protect information concerning, among other things, "business operations, customer agreements, corporate structure, the details of... customer base and how the company works with and licenses products to its customers and measures it takes to protect its intellectual property." Selling Source, LLC v. Red River Ventures, LLC 2011 WL 1630338, *6 (D. Nev. 2011). When court records concern such information, "the public's interest in understanding the judicial process is outweighed by the possibility that disclosure of these materials could reasonably result in infringement of the trade secrets." Id. (citing Dish Network L.L. C. v. Sonicview USA, Inc., 2009 WL 2224596, *7 (S.D. Cal. 2009)). Precisely the same compelling reasons are found here with respect to the documents which Moving Defendants request to seal.

B. There Are Compelling Reasons Justifying Sealing Records Because The Documents Which Moving Defendants Request To Seal Concern Business Operations and Sensitive Financial Information

Moving Defendants request to seal the May 2004 Production Agreement because it concerns Dodger Theatricals', the Four Seasons Partnership's, and Mr. Elice's and Mr. Brickman's business operations, detailing option payments; royalty payments and advances for musical compositions, life story rights and the book for Jersey Boys; profit participation; merchandising and motion picture rights, etc.; and because the May 2004 Production Agreement attaches the confidential 1999 Life Story Release. Moving Defendants request to seal the sample of checks to Mr. DeVito from Dodger Theatricals because these checks reflect Mr. DeVito's personal financial information and because they reflect royalties paid pursuant to the confidential 1999 Life Story Release between Messrs. DeVito, Massi, Valli and Gaudio. IIL CONCLUSION

The Court should grant Moving Defendants' motion. As the foregoing demonstrates, Moving Defendants have made a particularized showing of harm and there are compelling reasons justifying sealing the requested documents.

DANIEL M. MAYEDA

LEOPOLD PETRICH & SMITH, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

FRANKIE VALLI, ROBERT J.

GAUDIO, MARSHALL BRICKMAN,

ERIC S. ELICE, DES McANUFF,

DSHT, INC., DODGER THEATRICALS,

LTD., JB VIVA VEGAS L.P. AND

GETTING HOME, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:


Summaries of

Corbello v. DeVito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 14, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:O8-cv-00867-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Corbello v. DeVito

Case Details

Full title:DONNA CORBELLO, an individual Plaintiff, v. THOMAS GAETANO DEVITO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:O8-cv-00867-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 14, 2011)