From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COR v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 20, 1987
506 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-1094.

March 18, 1987. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 20, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Leroy Moe, J.

Kayo E. Morgan and Fred Haddad of Sandstrom Haddad, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eddie J. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions under Counts I and II but reverse as to Count III because we believe the evidence was insufficient to sustain that conviction. Cf. Adams v. State, 443 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Specifically, we find a lack of evidence of specific intent to deprive the bank of its funds at the time the bank loan was made. While it seems apparent that the appellant and his codefendant made some misrepresentations to the bank concerning the condition of the collateral, and in doing so may have committed some offense, we do not believe this converted the transaction from a loan to a larceny.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand with directions that appellant's conviction and sentence in Count III be vacated.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

COR v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 20, 1987
506 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

COR v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:IRA LEE COR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 20, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Tri-W Steel, Inc. v. Miami Nat. Bank

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Cor v. State, 506 So.2d 12 (Fla.4th DCA 1987); Sears, Roebuck Co. v. McKenzie, 502…